Legal Opinion

Carden v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 17, 1992No. 1910277PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue in this case is whether the defendant's confession was voluntary, in light of certain statements made by the sheriff.

David Michael Carden was arrested for capital murder; see § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975. Carden filed a motion to suppress his confession, alleging that it had been coerced. The trial court found the confession to be admissible and denied the motion to suppress. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that Carden's confession was coerced and, therefore, that the trial court erred in admitting it into evidence. 612 So.2d 504.

The facts are as follows: The victim, George…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Womack v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Ex Parte WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. D.M.M. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. W.T.J. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte PardueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API