Legal Opinion
The Caledonier
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 30, 1930No. Nos. 351, 352PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
When this suit was here before [Picard v. The Caledonier, 31 F.(2d) 257, 259], we held the valuation clause of the bill of lading providing: It is also mutually agreed that the value of “each package shipped hereunder does not exceed $100, * * * [or its equivalent in Belgian currency] on which basis the freight, is adjusted, and the carrier’s liability shall in no ease exceed -the sum unless a value in excess thereof be specially declared and stated herein, and extra freight as may be agreed on paid — was valid and enforceable in its terms and that appellee was entitled…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad v. Peninsula Produce ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The CaledonierDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932