Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1895No. 6808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application by plaintiff in error to the supreme court for an allowance for fees of his attorney for service rendered .in said court in the case reported in 42 Neb., 684.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, C. J.

In the district court of Otoe county an information was ■.filed charging .the defendant with the commission of a felony. Upon a proper affidavit being filed showing that •the accused was unable, by reason of poverty, to employ ■counsel, the district court appointed John A. Rooney, Esq., to appear for and defend the prisoner, who accepted the appointment and conducted the defense. At the trial the plaintiff in error was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary. To reverse •the judgment and sentence error was prosecuted to this •court, 'where the judgment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. County of Boone v. ArmstrongNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. McGregorIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In Re Claim of Rehm and FaesserNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Board of Commissioners v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Brackenbrough v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Moran v. Otoe CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API