State Ex Rel. Burton v. Whyte
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Justice:
James Michael Burton in this original writ of habeas corpus contends that his guilty plea was based on incompetent advice of counsel and that his conviction should therefore be set aside. We disagree and deny the writ.
The central issüe is whether Burton’s trial counsel was incompetent in advising him to plead guilty to a charge of grand larceny when a pretrial motion to suppress Burton’s written confession was denied. The principal challenge to the confession was that it was given by Burton some two days after he had conferred with a municipal police court judge who advised…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. PersingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BradshawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CecilWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Duncil v. KaufmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. OlishWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.