Ex parte Gainey v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Baker County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. :
The plaintiff in error, being in custody under an indictment found by the grand, jury of Baker county, charging him with murder in the first degree, sued but a writ of habeas corpus from the Circuit Court for the purpose of testing his right to bail. After hearing the evidence' for the State and for the defence the Circuit Judge entered the following- judgment: “Be it remembered that on this nth day of May, A. D. 1900, in obedience to the writ of habeas corpus heretofore allowed by me as. judge of said Circuit Court in this behalf, U. C. Herndon:, sheriff, toi whom said, writ was…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Ex Parte TullySupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Mendenhall, Ex. Rel. v. SweatSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Deeb v. GandySupreme Court of Florida · 1933