Legal Opinion

Novak, Admx., Etc. v. Chi. & C. Dist. Tr. Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1956No. 29,440PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAchor, J.

This is an action for wrongful death. The court directed a verdict for appellee at the conclusion of appellant’s evidence. This action was assigned as error in appellant’s motion for new trial and is relied upon as grounds for reversal in this appeal.

Basically three major questions are presented for our consideration. The first is: Was there some evidence of negligence on the part of appellant sufficient to necessitate taking the case to the jury? The second is: Was decedent guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law? The third is: Was there evidence of such expenses or of such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitaker, Admr. v. BorntragerIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. New York Cent. RR Co. v. JOHNSON, ADMX., ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Blanton v. Wheeler & Howes Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Holtz v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Jackson Hill Coal & Coke Co. v. BalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Weenig v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Hendrix v. HarbelisIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. SPIDEL ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API