Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Bainbridge

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1990No. 16808Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBistline, Justice

The Court undertook its review of State v. Sivak, 105 Idaho 900, 674 P.2d 396 (1983), when oral argument was heard on February 1, 1983, the briefs of counsel having been received and perused earlier. The opinion of the Court in Sivak was released August 15, 1983, and rehearing was denied on December 27, 1983. The majority opinion at 105 Idaho 902, 674 P.2d 396 gives mention to Randall Bainbridge, saying in one short paragraph that Bainbridge and Sivak were identified as persons present at the murder scene and that the two had been seen together before and after the killing.4

Although the Court…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API