Legal Opinion

Santana v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 19, 2015No. AC 14-P-923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

After a jury trial in Superior Court, Angel Santana was convicted of trafficking cocaine in the amount of fourteen to less than twenty-eight grams, in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32E(¿>), and trafficking in cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school zone, in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32J. This court vacated the judgments, concluding that the evidence was insufficient to establish that Santana constructively possessed the cocaine.1 Santana subsequently filed a complaint pursuant to G. L. c. 258D, the erroneous conviction statute. After discovery, the Common*554wealth moved for judgment on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoriaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Irwin v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Blackburn v. BlackburnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Renaud v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Santana v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Cruz v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
  3. Santana v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Santana v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. Santana v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API