Legal Opinion

James D. Vollertsen Associates Inc. v. John T. Nothnagle, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: In this action plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages. The order from which defendants appeal directs them to answer plaintiffs’ Interrogatory No. 83, namely, "Set forth the present net worth of each of the above-named Defendants”. The order was prematurely granted (see Rupert v Sellers, 48 AD2d 265). As we said in Rupert (supra), there should be a split trial, first on the issue of defendants’ liability for punitive or exemplary damages. If plaintiffs obtain a special verdict entitling them to punitive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rupert v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Raplee v. City of CorningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rupert v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Prior v. Brown Transport Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Dufresne v. DuemlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Bank of New York v. Ansonia AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API