Legal Opinion

Hine v. Aird-Don Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

A nonsuit in each action has been granted at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff is entitled to the most favorable inferences that may be drawn from the testimony. The proof shows, or so the jury might have found, that the unassembled parts of a new furnace, consisting of a base weighing 125 pounds, a fire pot weighing about 350 pounds, three boiler sections weighing about 125 pounds each and a box, were piled on the sidewalk in a residential section of the city of Albany and left there by the *360defendant’s truckmen on the morning of January 2, 1930, at a time when children were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Congreve v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Camardo v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Uggla v. BrokawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. McCloskey v. . BuckleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Huerzeler v. Central Cross Town RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of New York v. Milhelm Attea & Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  2. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Abbatiello v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. State v. Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Asumendi v. FergusonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API