Glaros v. Cleveland Trust Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentBell, J.
I can not agree with the conclusion of the majority that the General Assembly “clearly expressed an intention to restrict the application of that statute [Section 11663-1, General Code] to real property upon which had been located nothing substantial in addition to ‘a dwelling or dwellings for not more than two families.’ ”
The statute says, “upon which * * * there has been located a dwelling or dwellings for not more than two families.” It does not say, “upon which there has been located nothing substantial in addition to a dwelling or dwellings.”
The majority opinion cites paragraph four of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carr v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Montalto v. YeckleyOhio Supreme Court · 1941