Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided January 9, 2007No. 06-06-00049-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice CARTER.

James Clearnon Ingram was convicted by a jury for selling a controlled substance at a location within 1,000 feet of a playground. Two enhancement convictions were also alleged. Ingram chose to have the trial court assess his punishment— which it set at forty-five years’ imprisonment. The evidence shows that Ingram sold six rocks of crack cocaine (less than one gram) to an undercover officer. The question raised is whether the evidence also shows the sale occurred in a drug-free zone.

On appeal, Ingram contends the evidence is insufficient to prove that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Albert Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  2. Albert Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  3. Curlee, Dallas ShaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021
  4. Earnie Amos Barber v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
  5. Gabriel Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API