Legal Opinion
Port Authority of N.Y. & N.J. v. Barry
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 5, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed without costs.
In this action to recover the sum of $1,302, plaintiff Port Authority of New York and New Jersey alleged that defendant had used its facilities, namely, various river crossings, without paying the required tolls. Defendant interposed various counterclaims, and plaintiff moved for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaims on the ground that a notice of claim in conformance with the requirements of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7108 (L 1950, ch 301 [Act], § 8, as amended) was not timely served upon it. Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tripee v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Luciano v. Fanberg Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lyons v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Santiago v. New York & New Jersey Port AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Port Authority of New York v. Airport Auto Services, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007