Buchanan v. Selden
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of Washington county. Heard below before Dayis, J. See opinion for statement of the case. Plaintiff is entitled to a lien. (Great Western Mfg. Co. v. Hunter, 15 Neb., 37; Ballou v. Black, 17 Neb., 397; Gatyv.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court of Washington county. Heard below before Dayis, J. See opinion for statement of the case. Plaintiff is entitled to a lien. (Great Western Mfg. Co. v. Hunter, 15 Neb., 37; Ballou v. Black, 17 Neb., 397; Gatyv. Casey, 15 111., 192; Williams v. Chapman, 17 111., 425; Phillips, Mechanics’ Liens, secs. 16, 17, 215, 344, 345; Manley v. Downing, 15 Neb., 637; Murray v. Bapley, 30 Ark., 573; Williams v. Webb, 2 Dis. [O.J, 430; Hugg v. Hintrager, 45 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 1035; Reed v. Bagley, 24 Neb., 332; Missouri Valley Lumber Co. v. Weber, 43 Mo. App., 179; Pierce v.…
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
Some time in August, 1890, one Perry Selden was the owner of lot 15, in block 47, in the city of Blair, Nebraska, and on said date entered into a contract in writing with the Omaha Building Company, by the terms of which the latter agreed to furnish the material and construct a brick building for Selden on said lot. One L. McGreer & Co. and one P. L. Munroe, both of Omaha, furnished materials to the contractor, the Omaha Building Company, towards the erection of said building for Selden. McGreer & Co. failed, and one Abner A. Buchanan was appointed receiver for the firm. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. FisherdickNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hansen v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Denniston & Partridge Co. v. LutherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Disbrow & Co. v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Bohunek v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Drexel v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896