Legal Opinion

Freedman v. University of Houston

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 22, 2003No. 01-02-00294-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

In these interlocutory appeals, appellants, Glenn B. Freedman and Glenn A. Goerke, challenge the decisions of the trial courts in their respective cases to grant pleas to the jurisdiction filed by appellee, the University of Houston (“UH”). Because these appeals raise common issues, we consider them together. 1

In five issues, appellants argue that the trial courts erred in granting UH’s pleas to the jurisdiction in light of (1) section 111.33 of the Texas Education Code, 2 (2) the “open courts” provision of the Texas Constitution, 3 (3) the equitable nature of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Texas Southern University v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. De Mino v. Sheridan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  4. Labrado v. County of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  5. Sefzik v. City of McKinney, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API