Legal Opinion

Brown v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

*685Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from making unauthorized sales or exchanges of personally-owned items, based on charges that he had sold leather goods to other inmates, whose payments had been remitted to petitioner’s brother in Georgia. Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt was presented in the form…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dagnone v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Knight v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Sanders v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Dexter v. McGinnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API