Legal Opinion · Dissent

AM Liner East, Inc. v. Osburn

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 21, 2006No. Record No. 1639-05-2Published

1DissentFitzpatrick, C.J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and would affirm the commission’s decision finding that there was insufficient evidence to refer the employer’s application to the hearing docket.

An employer’s application for hearing will be deemed not “technically acceptable” and will be rejected unless the employer’s designated supporting documentation is sufficient to support a finding of probable cause to believe the employer’s grounds for relief are meritorious. The commission has defined the standard of “probable cause” as “[a] reasonable ground for belief in the existence of facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  2. Giant of Virginia, Inc. v. PiggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  3. Bass v. City of Richmond Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  4. McPeek v. P. W. & W. Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  5. Bristol Builders Supply Co. v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API