Legal Opinion

Bullard v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1917No. 1513PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Error to the 'District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Charleston; Henry A. Middleton Smith, Judge. George W. Bullard was convicted of illicit distilling, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPP, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error, defendant below, was" convicted of illicit distilling, and brings his case here on writ of error. The indictment contains seven counts, charging him, in substance: (a) With having in his possession or under his control a distilling apparatus which was not registered; (b) with being a distiller of spirits, “to wit, corn whisky,” without having given the bond required by law; (c) with carrying on the business of such distiller with intent to defraud the government of its tax; and (d) with working in a distillery for the production of spirits, “to wit,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Terry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API