Legal Opinion
United States v. McGovern
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 23, 1932No. 469PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
-(after stating the facts as above).
The appellant now complains because, as he says, due process of law was denied him, in that “there was no attempt to formulate or define an accusation against the defendant. He was confronted with an entire record, was told that he had testified falsely before the Grand Jury and that the false testimony was in the record of the proceedings.” The short and sufficient answer to this is found in the fact that counsel for the appellant expressly waived objection at the opening of the hearing. That there was any doubt or misapprehension as to the charges is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. John AluCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Richard A. ClearyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Elmer Dolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- In Re Grand Jury Witness Chanie WeissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.