Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Royal Insurance Company of America American Employers Insurance Co. v. Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 23, 2002No. 01-3645Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBye, Circuit Judge

I agree Royal breached its duty to defend Kirksville. Royal abandoned the defense soon after the district court held it had no duty to defend, even though Kirks-ville had appealed the erroneous ruling. If an insured appeals a trial court’s adverse ruling on a duty-to-defend claim, the insurer should continue to defend under a reservation of rights pending final resolution in the appellate court. See, e.g., Detroit Edison Co. v. Mich. Mut. Ins. Co., 102 Mich.App. 136, 301 N.W.2d 832, 836 (Mich. Ct.App.1981) (“When an insurer relies on a lower court ruling that it has no duty to defend, it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Whitehead v. Lakeside Hospital Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Esicorp, Inc. St. Louis Testing Laboratories, Inc., - Appellees/ Cross v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, - Appellant/ CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. Enchanted Hills, Inc. v. MedlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API