Creamer v. Amsterdam High School
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Best, J.), entered July 10, 1996 in Montgomery County, which denied a motion by third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action.
Defendant Dec-Tam Corporation, the general contractor on an asbestos abatement project at defendant Amsterdam High School in the City of Amsterdam, Montgomery County, subcontracted with third-party defendant, Pulver Roofing Company, Inc. (hereinafter Pulver), to install temporary roofing. Since the overall project involved asbestos removal, plaintiff Michael…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Adams v. Glass Fab, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Simon v. Schenectady North Congregation of Jehovah's WitnessesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- White v. Sperry Supply & Warehouse, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Knudsen v. Pentzien, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Piazza v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lawyer v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Fairchild v. Servidone Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Danchick v. Contegra Services, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Moffett v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.