Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Lazaro Roman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 30, 1993No. 90-9084Published

1Concurrence

TJOFLAT, Chief Judge,

specially concurring:

The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (the Sentencing Act),1 through the Guidelines,2 directs district courts to consider an offender’s criminal history when sentencing. In this case, the offender, Lazaro Roman, objected to the district court’s consideration of his 1987 Florida burglary conviction on the ground that the conviction was obtained in violation of the United States Constitution. The district court declined Roman’s invitation to review the constitutionality of the prior conviction. The question before us is whether the district court could…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API