Legal Opinion

Beauharnais v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1952No. 118Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

343 U.S. 250 (1952)

BEAUHARNAIS

v.

ILLINOIS.

No. 118.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 28, 1951.

Decided April 28, 1952.

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.

Alfred A. Albert argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Herbert Monte Levy.

William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General, John T. Coburn, Assistant Attorney General, and Albert I. Zemel.

2Opinion of the Court · FrankfurterJustice Frankfurter

The petitioner was convicted upon information in the Municipal Court of Chicago of violating § 224a of the Illinois…

Also in this document: Dissent · Black; Dissent · Reed; Dissent · Douglas; Dissent · Jackson.

3Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API