Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Albuquerque, City Of

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1996No. 95-2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant Jerry Rutherford was fired from his job with the City of Albuquerque because of a positive drug test. His challenge to the testing on due process and Fourth Amendment grounds was rejected by the district court, which granted summary judgment for the City on both claims. We affirm the court’s ruling on the due process claim, but conclude that the circumstances surrounding Rutherford’s testing constituted an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

I. Factual Background 2

Rutherford began working for the City of Albuquerque as a bus driver…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Western Conference of Teamsters v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Albuquerque v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Holton v. Dep't of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. Fontaine v. Clermont County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. City of Albuquerque v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Opinion No. (1998), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API