Legal Opinion

Nail v. Shipp

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided June 23, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00195Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION APRIL R. NAIL, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION: 17-00195-KD-B ) ROBERT M. SHIPP, et al., ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter came before the Court on this date for a hearing regarding Plaintiffs' Rule 65 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 233)1 and Defendants' Response (Doc. 235).2 First, given the posture of the case (post jury trial and post judgment), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 is not the proper vehicle for the relief Plaintiffs seek; namely, to enforce and collect on a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. Papadopoulos v. SIDIDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API