Legal Opinion

In Re Weiss, Healey & Rea

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 4, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

109 N.J. 246 (1988)

536 A.2d 266

IN RE WEISS, HEALEY & REA AND INDIVIDUALLY, JOSEPH C. WEISS, JAMES F. HEALEY AND THOMAS REA.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 29, 1987.

Decided February 4, 1988.

William T. Cahill, Jr., argued the cause for appellants, Weiss, Healey & Rea, etc., et al. (Cahill, Wilinski & Cahill, attorneys; Daniel M. Baker, on the brief).

Michael R. Clancy, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause, for respondent, Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Elmer M. Matthews argued the cause, for amicus…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scholastic Systems, Inc. v. LeloupSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. In Re Education Law Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. In Re Review of Opinion 475 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics & DR 2-102(C)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Petition of Felmeister & IsaacsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. In Re Weiss, Healey & ReaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API