Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the complaint as against defendants Bartley, Dangler, Harloe, Corona and Cannon, in an action for damages for alleged malpractice, judgment reversed on the law and the facts as to defendants Bartley, Dangler and Cannon, and a new trial granted as to them, with costs to abide the event, and judgment unanimously affirmed as to defendants Harloe and Corona, with costs. On appeal by defendant Greenberg, judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the question of liability of defendants Bartley, Dangler and Cannon was one of fact for…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pigno v. BunimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Fisher v. BartleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API