Legal Opinion

Gray v. Finn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Beplevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts .are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant Finn was collector of taxes for -the Fourth, ward of the city of Port Huron. By virtue of his tax warrant he levied upon certain persona] prop■erty as belonging to one Lewis Potts, to satisfy a personal tax assessed against him. Plaintiff, claiming to own the property, brought this action of replevin to recover it. As evidence of title he introduced a bill of sale from Potts to him.

The court instructed the jury as follows:

“ It is the claim of plaintiff that at the time when the property .was taken he was the owner of it; that he had a bill of sale of the same from Lewis Potts, who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Millar v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chippewa Hardware Co. v. AtwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API