Legal Opinion
Adams v. St. Croix Basic Services
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided September 27, 2002No. Civil No. 396/1998Published
1Opinion of the CourtCabret, Judge
*62MEMORANDUM OPINION
(September 27, 2002)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Settlement and the Defendant’s opposition. For the reasons which follow, the Court will grant the relief which Plaintiff seeks.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff, Christopher Adams (“Adams” or “Employee”), was employed with the defendant company. The circumstances under which his employment with the defendant ended are in dispute and were the subject of this action for damages. After litigation commenced, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, as evidenced by a release executed on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Rohm and Haas Company v. Buckeye Pipe Line Company, Rohm and Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Lesville James v. Zurich-American Insurance Company Of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Beloit Power Systems, Inc. v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
- Earthmovers, Inc. v. United States (In Re Earthmovers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996