Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Beyer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2014No. 07C11429; A150592PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHUMAN, S. J.

In this proceeding under ORS 183.490 to compel the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to order four utilities to establish “automatic adjustment clauses,” we reversed a supplemental judgment of the trial court awarding attorney fees to plaintiffs Ken Lewis and the Utility Reform Project (URP), concluding that there was no statutory authorization for the award. Lewis v. Beyer, 262 Or App 486, 325 P3d 59 (2014). On plaintiffs’ petition for reconsideration, we adhere to our conclusion but write briefly to correct errors in the opinion that are immaterial to the outcome.

The first error…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. BeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cascade Kelly Holdings, LLC v. Oregon Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API