Legal Opinion

Muller v. Bammann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Harry Bammann, by John Frederick Bammann, his guardian ad litem, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term, bearing date the 7th ■day of October, 1902, and entered in the office of the clerk of the -county of New York, denying the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to furnish security for costs, and granting the plaintiff leave to prosecute the action as a poor person.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

Under date of September 5, 1902, Ingle Carpenter was appointed guardian ad litem of Charlotte Muller, an infant under the age of fourteen years, and qualified as such guardian. On September *213sixth an exjpwrte order was granted by the court allowing the plaintiff to sue as a poor person. Thereafter the summons was served on the defendant, who appeared in the action by his guardian ad litem and made a motion to vacate and set aside the last-named order. This motion was granted, with leave to the plaintiff to renew the application. Subsequently, a motion was made upon notice to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Feier v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Rutkowsky v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. HautcharowAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  2. Perlmutter v. SteenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API