Leonard & Ansart v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to Hudson Quarter Sessions.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beasley, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs in error were indicted under the statute for having had in their possession a certain burglarious tool known as a “jimmy,” then and there adapted and designed for breaking open a building, room, vault or safe in order to steal therefrom money and other property, knowing the same to be adapted and designed for the purpose aforesaid, with intent to steal therefrom the money and goods, &c.
On the trial the general proof was to this effect: After midnight the defendants were at the Greenville station and became engaged…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HefflinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- State v. BartellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- State v. FaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Murray v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965