Legal Opinion
People v. Winkler
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the judgment reinstated, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division to remit to County Court for a hearing on defendant’s CPL article 440 motion.
On a prior appeal, we reversed the Appellate Division’s order granting, without benefit of a hearing, defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel. We concluded that counsel’s representation of defendant pursuant to a contingent fee arrangement did not, without more, constitute per se…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WinklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. WinklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard Winkler v. John Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- People v. GilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. WinklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Winkler v. KeaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- People v. WinklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989