Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1986No. C5-85-1065PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction and that the trial court committed reversible error in ruling that he could be impeached with evidence of prior convictions. We affirm.

FACTS

On September 24, 1983, Laureen Stewart, the victim, spent the afternoon at the duplex of Andrew Logan. Appellant Daniel Ford, who had been dating Logan’s sister, was also present. Stewart stated that she was interested in buying a car, and she asked appellant if he knew much about cars. Shortly thereafter,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Warren v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. SchwabCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API