Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Tippett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 18, 2010No. 27791-7-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKorsmo, J.

¶1 This is a dispute over the proceeds of a life insurance policy between the assignee and the named beneficiary. We agree with the trial court, although on different grounds, that the assignee is entitled to the proceeds. We affirm the judgment.

FACTS

¶2 Hal and Bonnie Krueger borrowed money from Jack and Blanche Tippett several times beginning in 1976. The loans were secured by real estate owned by the Kruegers. Hal Krueger also assigned “all rights, title and interest” in the proceeds of a $50,000 insurance policy on his life as “collateral security.” Clerk’s Papers 24; Ex. A. The assignment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. BRAZIER CONSTR.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bellevue School District No. 405 v. Brazier Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lane v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Dan E. Mason and Beverly R. Mason v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Sherron Associates Loan Fund V (Mars Hotel), LLC v. SaucierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Heritage Restoration, Inc v. Douglas Radabaugh, Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. SHERRON ASSOCIATES LOAN FUND v. SaucierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State of Washington v. Phillippe Antwan BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API