Legal Opinion
Alfred Burdette Mayfield v. United States Parole Commission and United States Probation Office
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1981No. 80-1723PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
On July 14, 1980, the pro se appellant filed a notice of appeal from a May 12, 1980, order denying him relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The notice was three days late. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). 1 He has filed no motion to extend time for filing a notice of appeal, and the time for doing so has now…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carl H. Alley v. Dodge HotelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Jack Leon LucasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- James Edward Craig v. Warden Sam P. Garrison, Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Price Moorer v. Timothy GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by44 opinions
- Shah v. HuttoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Ralph Pryor v. R.C. Marshall, Sup't.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Alaska Limestone Corp. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Robert Elijah Washington v. Michael E. Bumgarner J. Gainey, Officer W.E. McMichaels M. Thomas, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Timothy Malone v. John Avenenti, Warden Robert Corbin, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.