Legal Opinion

Franco v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The respondent was injured as a result of the alleged negligence of the City of New York. He did not serve a notice within sixty days after the claim arose, as required by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. (L. 1945, ch. 694.) Two days after the expiration of such period the respondent moved at Special Term for an order granting leave to him to serve a proposed notice of claim within a reasonable time, on a ground set forth in subdivision 5 of the section, namely, physical incapacity and inability to serve a notice in time. Order granting the motion reversed on the law and the facts,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Embery v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Rudolph v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fullam v. Westchester County Playland CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Claims of Carr v. Genesee Valley Regional Market AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Sullivan v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API