Roberts v. . Roberts
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
If the parties had expended, in the repairs of the ditch in controversy, one-half of the amount incurred in the prosecution and defence of this action, their respective farms would have been protected from injury by the overflow of water, and those fraternal relations which ought to exist between brothers, might have remained unimpaired. The slightest attention to the spirit of the golden rule, would have induced an adjustment of the points in dispute to the mutual satisfaction and advantage of both. But we can only deal with their legal rights and obligations.
The father and grantor of both…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
3Cited by12 opinions
- Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty v. JessupNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Smith v. YoumansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Huntington v. . AsherNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Wessels v. ColebankIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Sweeney v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.