Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Bank of Newport

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 1990No. 88-1891; CA A50177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action against Thiel Creek Development Company, Gary V. Diers, one of its officers (defendants), and the Bank of Newport (Bank), alleging that Bank had intentionally inflicted emotional distress on them and breached its fiduciary duty and that defendants and Bank had engaged in a conspiracy against plaintiffs. The trial court dismissed the claim against defendants on res judicata grounds and awarded them sanctions under ORCP 17 against plaintiffs and Everhart, their attorney. It then entered judgment for defendants under ORCP 67B. Plaintiffs appeal and challenge both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Andrews v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. First Interstate Bank v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Bank of NewportOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Craven v. ShuttleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Sinio v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API