Martin v. Martin's Adm'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Thomas
Affirming.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether or not the amount of what has come to be known at the Federal estate tax (Fed. Stat. Ann., 1918 Supp., Sections 201, 202, 203, 205, 207, etc.; U. S. Compiled Statutes 1918, Section 6336%b. also found in U. S. Code Annotated 1934 Ed., Section 410; present ed., 26 U. S. C. A. Int. Rev. Code, Section 810) should be borne equally by the beneficiaries as between themselves, regardless of the character of property received by them from the estate, or whether the amount of the federal demand should be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re the Accounting of HamlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Plunkett v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Gallagher's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Pearcy v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Trimble v. Hatcher's Ex'rsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- In Re Estate of GelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.