Hamilton Pipe Line Co. v. Stanolind Pipe Line Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Riner, Chief Justice.
The Stanolind Pipe Line Company designated subsequently usually as the “applicant” on April 29, 1947 made an application to the Wyoming Public Service Commission, herein usually mentioned as the “Commission”, seeking a certificate of public convenience and necessity to construct, operate, and maintain a pipe line for the transportation of oil from what is commonly known as the Hamilton Dome Oil Field to Hot Springs, Wyoming, together with a gathering system in said Field to connect with its main pipe line about twelve and a half miles northwest of that field.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brennan v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Radalj v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. MacHovecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Consumers Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Wyoming Hereford Ranch v. Hammond Packing Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Diefenderfer v. BuddWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Rawson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Cyr v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1989