Legal Opinion

Roth v. Lieske

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1972No. 38464PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.

Plaintiff, formerly a patrolman with the Nebraska State Patrol, filed under the provisions of section 77-2407, R. R. S. 1943, after his employment had ended, a claim with the State of Nebraska for overtime pay. The claim was denied. Plaintiff appealed to the district court for Lancaster County which affirmed the denial.

Most of the pertinent facts are agreed to by stipulation. The only witness was Col. James E. Kruger, Superintendent of the Nebraska State Patrol. Plaintiff was employed by the patrol from June 13, 1966, to April 30, 1971. It is agreed that he was hired on the basis of a 50-hour…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Acton v. SchoenauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Umberger v. SankeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wrede v. City of David CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. (2003), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API