Legal Opinion

Covello v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1984No. 83-2355PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We reject Covello’s contention that he was entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule. We affirm.

Executing a search warrant, police held Covello in his home at gunpoint. He was handcuffed, not permitted to move from his chair or to smoke a cigarette, and was photographed. He was released, however, and was therefore not entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191; D.L.M. v. State, 397 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); he was not taken into custody within the meaning of the rule.

Florida courts, addressing the issue of custody and speedy trial considerations, have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. State v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. State v. ChristianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. D. L. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LailDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. State v. ColladoPalm Beach County Court · 1987
  3. T.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API