Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2000No. 97-CM-1590PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Following a non-jury trial, appellant Johnson was convicted of possession of marijuana, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(d) (1998). On appeal he contends that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate inquiry into his mid-trial claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and committed reversible error when it granted a blanket Fifth Amendment privilege to Quentin Mims, the sole defense witness in the case. We find no error and accordingly affirm.

I

On February 19, 1997, two Metropolitan Police officers approached a car parked behind a house in the 500 block of Hobart…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Lee-Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Malone v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
  4. JAMES EARL BLACKMON v. DAVID D. LEWISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Lee-Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API