Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Dieckmann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1984No. Nos. 47449, 47612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Action by an assignee, General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) for a deficiency on an automobile installment sales contract. Defendants (buyers) counterclaimed on the grounds Lou Fusz Motor Company (seller) sold them a defective Pontiac and refused to take it back. Under the installment sales contract, GMAC was subject to all claims and defenses buyers could assert against the seller. On May 17,1983, the trial court entered judgment against buyers for the deficiency, interest and attorney’s fees. We affirm.

Buyers raise three points on appeal. In their first point,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Brazell v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grus v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Wright v. KenneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Fitzgerald v. Don Darr Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MellorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API