Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Jung

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 86634Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE FREEMAN,

specially concurring:

I concur in the judgment reached by the court today. Nevertheless, I, like Justice McMorrow, believe that the court’s opinion “fails to adequately explain the basis for its judgment.” See 192 Ill. 2d at 17 (McMorrow, J., specially concurring). I base my decision in this case on the reasons set forth in Justice McMorrow’s special concurrence, in which I fully join.

I write separately, however, to provide a more complete picture of the State’s briefing deficiencies as identified in the court’s opinion and in the dissents. I agree with the court that the brief…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. Immanuel Lutheran Evangelical Congregation, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Zadrozny v. City CollegesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. 47th & State Currency Exchange, Inc. v. B. Coleman Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Richard T. Kopec v. City of Elmhurst, a Municipal Corporation, and Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of ElmhurstCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Biggs v. SpaderIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API