Legal Opinion

Gimbel Bros. v. Adams

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

'At the time of the purchase by Mrs. Adams in September, 1916, she and the defendant were not then living together, she having taken up her abode and earning her own living in Chicago, having left Milwaukee, their former home. This the court,finds was without the consent and not by the fault of defendant. There is support in the evidence for the findings of the court so far as the purchases in question here were for Mrs. Adams’ own *593use, and his conclusion in that regard that the defendant ought not to be held chargeable for the same cannot be disturbed. Plaintiff failed to meet the burden…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Francis H. Leggett & Co. v. West Salem Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Gnat v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Sturtevant v. StarinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Morgenroth v. SpencerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Shuman v. SteinelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zuehlke v. OttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API