Sands v. Lindsey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ELLINGTON, Chief Judge.
David Sands appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Elizabeth Lindsey on his premises liability claim. He contends that Lindsey is not entitled to summary judgment because jury issues remain on whether he was an invitee or a licensee on her premises and, if the jury determines that he was a licensee, whether Lindsey’s negligence was wilful or wanton. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- London Iron & Metal Co. v. AbneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Baxley v. Williams Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Ingram v. Peachtree South, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Aldredge v. SymbasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Wilbanks v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kwabena Shedeke v. Patricia GarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024