Hunter v. BD. OF EDUC., MONT. CNTY.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDavidson, J.
I agree with the majority that individuals engaged in the educational process who intentionally injure a child entrusted to their educational care should be held liable. *492Accordingly, I agree with the majority’s holding that petitioners are entitled to maintain an action against the individual defendants for the intentional injuries alleged.
I do not agree with the majority, however, that individuals engaged in the educational process who, through professional malpractice, negligently injure a child entrusted to their educational care should not be held liable. In my view a cause of action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Vance v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- State v. HousekeeperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Nolan v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Johns Hopkins Hospital v. GendaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.