Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hunter v. BD. OF EDUC., MONT. CNTY.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 7, 1982No. [No. 32, September Term, 1981.]Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDavidson, J.

I agree with the majority that individuals engaged in the educational process who intentionally injure a child entrusted to their educational care should be held liable. *492Accordingly, I agree with the majority’s holding that petitioners are entitled to maintain an action against the individual defendants for the intentional injuries alleged.

I do not agree with the majority, however, that individuals engaged in the educational process who, through professional malpractice, negligently injure a child entrusted to their educational care should not be held liable. In my view a cause of action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Vance v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. State v. HousekeeperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Nolan v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. GendaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API