Greenshields v. Greenshields

I respectfully dissent because I find no meaningful distinction between the facts of this case and Van Vorgue v. Rankin, 41 So.3d 849 (Fla. 2010). In Van Vorgue, our supreme court made it clear that a trial court's order directing proceeds from the sale of real property in escrow is not an injunction where the funds were already "restricted" by agreement of the parties. Id. at 853.

As in Van Vorgue, the parties here entered into a loan agreement wherein Former Wife granted Former Husband the right "to direct or cause to direct on a first priority basis the proceeds of the sale of the [Merritt…